Am Sat, 09 Dec 2017 21:10:25 -0800 schrieb Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>:
> On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 10:39:43 PST Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > On 09/12/17 19:39, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > On sábado, 9 de dezembro de 2017 07:51:11 PST Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > >> That's a shame indeed. Redirecting people one by one to > > >> http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/ doesn't scale well. > > > > > > It takes two clicks to go from https://qt.io to > > > https://www.qt.io/download-qt-for-application-development and the open > > > source version is right there. > > > > > > That is, if you manage to click the "Start free Qt trial" button on the > > > homepage, since it moves the moment you hover the mouse over it. > > > > I'm not sure why I would ever assume a "free trial" to take me to the > > Open Source or Free Software version of something :-/ > > I agree it's not obvious, but it's the most likely entry from the webpage > since there's no Download button. > ah, they even made it "Must make 'open' consumer devices" now ;) (don't remember the exact wording of the previous statement, but sounded like "you must/cannot use qt for devices", which simply is wrong...) -- /* * fprintf (stderr, "Not ELF nor a.out. Don't blame me.\n"); * linux-2.6.19/arch/sparc64/boot/piggyback.c */ _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest