> On Saturday November 11 2017 11:56:49 René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > And sorry for the rapid-firing, but how should one interpret 5.212 vs. 5.9 in > the branch names on code.qt.io/.../qtwebkit ? Is the former less coupled to a > specific Qt version, for instance?
Yes, exactly. > > Keep up the good work in any case! Thanks! >> Now that's interesting! Do the tarballs available via Qt >> (qtwebkit-opensource-src-*) follow these developments - basically, do they >> contain snapshots of QtWebKit that are up-to-date at the time they're >> bundled? Not yet. The closest thing that exists at downloads.qt.io for now is [1], so far all pre-releases were published at [2] [1] http://download.qt.io/snapshots/ci/qtwebkit/5.9/latest/src/submodules/ Note that "5.9.2" means Qt version which _binaries_ were built against, and is actually irrelevant in the tarball name [2] https://github.com/annulen/webkit/releases >> >> Thanks! >> R. -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
