09.05.2017, 20:01, "René J.V. Bertin" <rjvber...@gmail.com>: > On Tuesday May 09 2017 18:59:17 Konstantin Shegunov wrote: > > Hi, > >> I don't know what exactly you're going to do/need, but for math you > > Me neither, for now it's just a general question. The answers to which will > probably hint at what I could do with them :) > >> should consider using a specialized library (e.g. Eigen - >> http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Main_Page); I don't believe >> Qt features such optimizations. > > Exactly, hence the question! The specialised libraries (Eigen, Vc) have their > own APIs, AFAIK only the old MacSTL aims to be a drop-in replacement to STL > classes. That drop-in replacement aspect is very convenient: it would > probably not be hard to find applications for an accelerated QVector (or so) > that speeds up things like calculating a CRC with minimal effort (and most of > the time without adding a library dependency).
Note that there is no surprise in that you'll find many drop-in replacements for STL containers or algorithms, intended for various purposes, but nothing like that for Qt, because the former APIs are standardized. > > R. > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
