2017-03-12 11:21 GMT+01:00 Frédéric Marchal <frederic.marc...@wowtechnology.com>: > Could somebody kindly summarize the reasons for adding more options such as > min_c++ or c++latest or restricting to only one C++ version?
My reasons: - You get what you ask for: c++11 is c++11, not c++14 or c++20 (why would 42 mean 75?) - You ask for what you want, not rely on internal config logic: min-c++11 means c++11 or above - You don't get more than you ask for, c++ versions are not inclusive nor incremental, semantics change and suff gets removed too sometimes: max-c++11 means c++11 or below - If you want features as they come in, fire and forget: c++latest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
