Thiago Macieira wrote: > Qt changed licences with 5.7: it's now GPLv2 and LGPLv3 (plus commercial). > GPLv3 is mentioned explicitly in the licence headers but it's implicitly > required by the LGPLv3 anyway.
Thanks. So you think we don't need (as in, it's safer) to list GPL3 explicitly if we list LGPL3? R. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
