On 1/5/2017 8:51 AM, william.croc...@analog.com wrote:
On 01/05/2017 10:29 AM, Bob Hood wrote:
On 1/5/2017 8:03 AM, Jason H wrote:
The mantra is to use QML.
I just wrote a wonderful utility using Qt 5.6.2 and Widgets for the
desktop, and
there's no hint of QML in it. It functions beautifully, is easily
maintainable,
and even has full animations.
I don't think the mantra is QML. The mantra is: Look at your need, your goal,
and choose the Qt technology that best fits it. If that's QML, fine. If that's
Widgets, fine. Unless Qt reps step up here and support your statement (which
will have ramifications for me and, I'm sure, many others), summarily
stating to
somebody that they should use QML as the primary tech for a new desktop app
is,
I think, dogmatic, at best, and continues to fuel the anxiety that Qt is
pouring
all the love into a QML/mobile focus.
... you mean, it isn't ?
Certainly, it would seem to be the case, but if that's also an official
position, then I'd appreciate a representative of Qt stepping up and saying so
publicly. I would have decisions to make concerning my project's commercial
license, and my product's future direction, based upon it.
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
