On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:02 PM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes and no. Behind the scenes the code would of course look much like > that, but in user code I was thinking along the lines of > [snippet] >
That's easily achieved by a rather trivial inline function returning a reference to the hash (and all the ugly code is then hidden). I considered what you suggested, of course. Writing such a generic > interface makes sense if you can reuse it sufficiently often (or if you > have really many entries to add), but rarely if you have just a few small > dicts to create here and there. > Then I'd vote for Thiago's solution. The only drawback with it is that it requires C++11 support, but that should be available pretty much anywhere nowadays.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
