Il 29/12/2016 06:56, Philippe ha scritto: > Sometimes there are discussions about what is best QVector vs > std::vector, and here we have a good "plus" for QVector.
In C++17 std::vector (well, std::allocator) must honour overly-aligned types: > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0035r4.html GCC 7 and Clang 4 already implement it. Before C++17 you could've used an aligned allocator like Boost.Align. QVector doesn't allow custom allocators, so here we have a win for std::vector. Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company | Tel: UK +44-1625-809908 KDAB - Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
