On sexta-feira, 4 de novembro de 2016 14:43:58 PDT Jason H wrote: > I am interested in this as well, but more to know how it is implemented. It > sounds to me like it's a Qt-compile-time thing, rather than a more general > approach. I'm wondering if it wouldn't be possible to compile only those > classes your app needs (as seen by MOC) and link in a million little class > libararies into one, which is then linked to the app. Of course with such > an approach you might have to force include some classes for polymorphic > reasons.
MOC has nothing to do with that. Moc doesn't see your entire codebase, doesn't transform it, doesn't remove code. That's a complete misconception of what moc is about. What you're asking for already exists and is called "static build". That causes the linker to discard everything that your app doesn't use. That is also not what Qt Lite is about. Qt Lite is about making changes that are not allowed in Qt 5 due to binary compatibility reasons that will cause smaller code. It's also about reviving the old feature system so that you can depopulate dynamic libraries instead of being forced to use static. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
