27.10.2016, 02:26, "Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]>: > On quarta-feira, 26 de outubro de 2016 21:18:18 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> 26.10.2016, 21:10, "Phil Weinstein" <[email protected]>: >> > It would be helpful for us to know the Qt development community's thinking >> > about the future of Qt widget styles. Is, and will Fusion continue to be >> > the (or a) favored widget style for the foreseeable future? >> > >> > Our context: We are very late in the game porting our huge Qt 4.8.5 >> > application to Qt 5. We can't easily move beyond Qt 5.5.1 because we are >> > using QWebKit (including HTML-DOM API provisions, which are not >> > available, nor readily possible in QWebEngine, being that the document >> > "lives" in a separate process, as I understand). >> FYI, you can move to Qt 5.7 right now, by using QtWebKit binaries from >> Technology Preview 4: >> >> https://github.com/annulen/webkit/releases/tag/qtwebkit-tp4 > > You can also use Qt 5.7 with the QtWebKit from 5.5. I think there's even a > release tarball of qtwebkit specifically made for 5.7. See > http://download.qt.io/community_releases/5.7/5.7.0/ > > This is the same QtWebKit, which means the same bugs and same security flaws > that existed in 5.5. And same lack of support.
Actually, a number of bugs were fixed since then. > > In other words, you're in a much better position because the rest of Qt was > updated. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
