26.10.2016, 21:10, "Phil Weinstein" <[email protected]>: > It would be helpful for us to know the Qt development community's thinking > about the future of Qt widget styles. Is, and will Fusion continue to be the > (or a) favored widget style for the foreseeable future? > > Our context: We are very late in the game porting our huge Qt 4.8.5 > application to Qt 5. We can't easily move beyond Qt 5.5.1 because we are > using QWebKit (including HTML-DOM API provisions, which are not available, > nor readily possible in QWebEngine, being that the document "lives" in a > separate process, as I understand).
FYI, you can move to Qt 5.7 right now, by using QtWebKit binaries from Technology Preview 4: https://github.com/annulen/webkit/releases/tag/qtwebkit-tp4 For more information about QtWebKit current state and future please read http://qtwebkit.blogspot.com/2016/08/qtwebkit-im-back.html > > All of our documentation currently uses the WindowsVista style, BUT WE ARE > SEEING BUGGY QTreeWidget visuals in Qt 5.5.1 (we tried also Qt 5.4.2. Same). > > Specifically we are seeing this first bug, which was reported only in Qt 5.6 > and addressed in Qt 5.6.1 (under the second related bug). > > * QTBUG-51799: QTreeView on Windows: Artifacts when hovering/selecting > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-51799 > > * QTBUG-52230: The style of the QTreeView component get's screwed up > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-52230 >> More info: There is also sub-optimal highlighting (even with some artifacts >> left over) in item selection ornamentation. That, and the tree open-close >> control's "hover" problem (and changing from triangles to +/-) don't always >> show up right away, but only after a certain amount of exercising >> QTreeWidgets. (We're seeing this in Qt 5.4.2 and Qt 5.5.1). > > It looks like _some things_ were done in 5.6 itself to attempt to address > WindowsVista style problems. We've attempted to apply those changes > (including those resulting from the QTBUG-52230 fix) to Qt 5.5.1, but that > became too complicated before we even achieved the desired result. > SO, we are thinking of taking the dive in switching from WindowsVista to > Fusion. But we'd first like to get an indication of how long that style will > be recommended and well supported. > > Thank you in advance, > Phil Weinstein, CADSWES > , > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
