I used MinGW in the past as I hate that bloated VS/MSVC. When Qt switched to Chromium/WebEngine, I got stuck with MSVC on Windows unfortunately.
The last Months I read a lot of Stuff about Clang and that it made some progress on Windows. Thats the only reason I keep looking to make my daily MSVC usage a little easier in the long run. On 02.10.2016 23:10, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 2 de outubro de 2016 23:00:00 MDT Oliver Niebuhr wrote: >> Hmm I thought Clang would be more stable now. Yeah I am just a >> Amateur/Hobby Developer. Fixing Compiler Bugs is a little over my Head >> still. > > Regular Clang is. It's clang-cl that isn't. > > If you want to use clang.exe on Windows, with a compatible MinGW > installation, > you can. I don't see why you would, since MinGW GCC is better tested and > generates better code. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
