On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 09:20:43PM +0100, Sérgio Martins wrote: > Hi, > > > It's not unusual for us developers and contributors to lose > perspective of what's important. > After many years spent on very particular implementation details, it > becomes difficult to see outside of the box. > > And because we already know the good aspects I'm asking only about the bad. > No need to discuss or reach an agreement, just go ahead and enumerate > what you don't like. > > > Personally, I don't know (too much time inside the box), but after > googling these came up frequently: > > - C++ is difficult, Qt lacks quality bindings for mainstream languages > - moc (on build systems that don't automate this step) > - FUD around licensing > > Please state your top ones, even if it was already stated by someone > else, so we have an idea about which ones matter more.
On the technical side: #1: The very existence of *two* largely incompatible technology stacks. #2: Lack of full C++ access to the stack that currently receives most development attention. [repeat] #6: Mandatory(!) use of JavaScript in said stack, embedded(!) in a DSL, thwarting any claims of being "declarative" and any originally hoped-for benefits for tooling. [#7: Incompatitible feature development for both stacks, would be a non-issue if #1 didn't exist] Andre' _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
