> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 4:36 PM > From: "Alejandro Exojo" <s...@badopi.org> > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] Thoughts on a 'proper' (or standard) file/io API for > QML? > > On Wednesday 10 August 2016 17:09:17 Jason H wrote: > > I know it's not a normal thing, but occasionally in QML we need to access > > files. Exposing an object is not hard, but it would be really good to have > > a standard to enable QML libraries that use file IO. > > > > There are two ways to basically so this: > > - QML Specific API > > - Node.JS-compatible API > > > > I did find this: https://github.com/trollixx/node.qml > > This is a different thing IMHO. > > > But I think this is something Qt needs to standardize on. My opinion is to > > use the Node API, which contains sync and async functions. > > > > Does anyone have any opinions or insight on this? > > Yes, isn't that what CommonJS intended? I don't remember what Qbs had, but > something like that I think. > > Meanwhile, you should check this: > > http://ibeliever.github.io/quickly/
That's great, but not dual licensed. It's GPLv3. I still think Qt should provide a QML file IO API. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
