https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-44804 - [iOS] [Android] Add an API to Qt for sending push notifications
On 28 June 2016 at 16:22, Jason H <jh...@gmx.com> wrote: > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-32335 - Add support for > Notifications (Android, reported July 2013) > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-4011 - Add support for native > notification systems. (4.5, unresolved) > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-29611 - (Desktop) Notifications > (Mar 2010, P2, open) > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-49336 - Support new OS X > Notification Center banners for systray balloon notification. (Nov 1015) > > There does not seem to be one for iOS, but I suspect the OSX one would > work? The issues are there, have been there, they just aren't being worked > on. > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 at 9:59 AM > > From: "Jason H" <jh...@gmx.com> > > To: "Tuukka Turunen" <tuukka.turu...@qt.io> > > Cc: "interest@qt-project.org" <interest@qt-project.org> > > Subject: Re: [Interest] 5.8 Features? > > > > > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 at 5:40 PM > > > From: "Tuukka Turunen" <tuukka.turu...@qt.io> > > > To: "Jason H" <jh...@gmx.com>, "Daniel França" < > daniel.fra...@gmail.com> > > > Cc: "interest@qt-project.org" <interest@qt-project.org> > > > Subject: RE: [Interest] 5.8 Features? > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Interest [mailto:interest-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt.io@qt- > > > > project.org] On Behalf Of Jason H > > > > Sent: maanantaina 27. kesäkuuta 2016 21.15 > > > > To: "Daniel França" <daniel.fra...@gmail.com> > > > > Cc: interest@qt-project.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Interest] 5.8 Features? > > > > > > > > > > > > Could we possibly come up with a "mobile features" priority list > > > > and help focus what gets delivered? > > > > > > > > > > That would be very much welcome. It is possible to make suggestions in > the bugreports.qt.io JIRA for new features. If there already exists a > suggestion, it is possible to vote for the implementation of the feature. > > > > > > I do personally believe that a lot of the same value that Qt has as a > solid c++ toolkit for creating large scale enterprise desktop applications > holds true also for large scale mobile applications. If you have a large > team developing with some of the mobile only frameworks over a long period > of time, maintenance can become a burden. Now, for independent developers > it may be a bit less challenging, but having a solid and well structured > (Qt) framework should benefit in the non-trivial applications. > > > > > > As I wrote earlier to this thread, we have invested quite a lot into > mobile lately, but perhaps not visible enough. For example, the WinRT / > Windows 10 support has been created from scratch in the past couple of > releases. For many focusing to Android and iOS only that probably does not > matter, but from the whole picture it is important for Qt. Also the > creation on lightweight Qt Quick Controls 2 as well as renewal of the > HighDPI/scalability support have been big and important tasks. > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I'm going to say that porting to WinRT when the platform is dead > isn't a productive use of developer time (Win10 sure). ( > http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/23/11743594/microsoft-windows-phone-market-share-below-1-percent > ) I understand that QPA wants to shine, but really hitting more basic, > missing features of exsiting phone OSs is a better use of time IMHO. WinRT > might be a special case because of that MS is doing with Win10, but I would > not pile that on to the 'mobile' category. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Interest mailing list > > Interest@qt-project.org > > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
