2016-06-09 8:20 GMT+02:00 Elvis Stansvik <elvst...@gmail.com>:
> 2016-06-09 7:54 GMT+02:00 Elvis Stansvik <elvst...@gmail.com>:
>> 2016-06-08 23:59 GMT+02:00 Jason H <jh...@gmx.com>:
>>> I'm coming into this late, but can't you just set up:
>>>
>>> Item { // delegate
>>>
>>> Item {
>>> id: view1
>>> visible: some_data_item_property == true
>>> }
>>> Item {
>>> id: view2
>>> visible: !view1.visible
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> Then make view1 and view2 your different delegates? You're just going after
>>> two diferent views, right?
>>
>> Well it's ~5, but indeed that seems to work great! A little test:
>>
>>
>> import QtQuick 2.4
>> import QtQuick.Window 2.2
>>
>> import "."
>>
>> Window {
>> title: "Test"
>> width: 600
>> height: 900
>> visible: true
>>
>> ListModel {
>> id: listModel
>> dynamicRoles: true
>> Component.onCompleted: {
>> append({
>> "type": "color",
>> "name": "foo",
>> "value": "red"
>> });
>> append({
>> "type": "flag",
>> "name": "bar",
>> "value": false
>> });
>> append({
>> "type": "choice",
>> "name": "bar",
>> "value": "Foo",
>> "choices": ["Foo", "Bar"]
>> });
>> }
>> }
>>
>> ListView {
>> anchors.fill: parent
>>
>> model: listModel
>> delegate: Rectangle {
>> implicitHeight: {
>> if (type === "color")
>> return colorDelegate.implicitHeight
>> if (type === "flag")
>> return flagDelegate.implicitHeight
>> if (type === "choice")
>> return choiceDelegate.implicitHeight
>> }
>> Text {
>> id: colorDelegate
>> text: value + " (color)"
>> visible: type === "color"
>> }
>> Text {
>> id: flagDelegate
>> text: value + " (flag)"
>> visible: type === "flag"
>> }
>> Text {
>> id: choiceDelegate
>> text: value + " (choice)"
>> visible: type === "choice"
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>
> It does not really solve the "problem" though. Say one of my delegates
> is a ColorDelegate for when the item represents a color, and I want to
> provide editing (my model has a setColor(index, color)).
>
> I will then have to use parent.ListView.view.model.setColor(index,
> color), thereby tying the color delegate to this way of working: It
It seems there is actually something called just "model" available in
the delegate and its children, but it's of type
QQmlDMAbstractItemModelData, and I get a TypeError if trying to treat
it as my custom model (e.g. calling my setColor(index, color) slot).
Elvis
> can't be reused in another context where I have a model known to
> consist of only colors (well not without artificially nesting it
> inside something else, like an invisible Rectangle, so that the
> reference to setColor works).
>
> On the C++ side, it's a bit easier to make delegates that are reusable
> in these two situations, since you work with createEditor and friends
> instead.
>
> Elvis
>
>>
>> I wonder why I haven't seen this approach before while searching around.
>>
>> Elvis
>>
>>>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 at 11:49 AM
>>> From: "Elvis Stansvik" <elvst...@gmail.com>
>>> To: "Kristoffersen, Even (NO14)" <even.kristoffer...@honeywell.com>,
>>> "interest@qt-project.org Interest" <interest@qt-project.org>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [Interest] Awkwardness of delegates in heterogenous ListViews
>>>
>>> 2016-06-08 15:41 GMT+02:00 Kristoffersen, Even (NO14)
>>> <even.kristoffer...@honeywell.com>:
>>>> Have you tried something like this in the delegate?
>>>>
>>>> property alias some_descriptive_name: parent
>>>
>>> It seems it's not allowed to use parent as the target of an alias (?):
>>>
>>> file:///home/estan/qte/qte/qml/ItemDelegate.qml:5 Invalid alias reference.
>>> Unable to find id "parent"
>>>
>>> And this would still tie my "subdelegates" to this structure. They could not
>>> be reused in other places, where lists are homogenous and I'm not using the
>>> Loader approach.
>>>
>>> But I guess there's really no way to make a delegate that can be used in
>>> both the "normal" situation and in the indirect-through-Loader approach.
>>>
>>> Elvis
>>>
>>>>
>>>> (Not tested, just an idea)
>>>>
>>>> -Even
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Interest
>>>> [mailto:interest-bounces+even.kristoffersen=honeywell....@qt-project.org]
>>>> On
>>>> Behalf Of Elvis Stansvik
>>>> Sent: 8. juni 2016 15:34
>>>> To: interest@qt-project.org Interest <interest@qt-project.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Interest] Awkwardness of delegates in heterogenous ListViews
>>>>
>>>> 2016-06-08 15:32 GMT+02:00 Elvis Stansvik <elvst...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm currently using a "type" role in my items and then a Loader as
>>>>> delegate, to give a level of indirection and let me choose the actual
>>>>> delegate based on the "type" of the item.
>>>>>
>>>>> This explains it better (from my ListView):
>>>>>
>>>>> delegate: Loader {
>>>>> sourceComponent: {
>>>>> switch (type) {
>>>>> case "color":
>>>>> return colorDelegate
>>>>> case "flag":
>>>>> return flagDelegate
>>>>> ...
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Component {
>>>>> id: colorDelegate
>>>>>
>>>>> ColorDelegate { }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> Component {
>>>>> id: flagDelegate
>>>>>
>>>>> FlagDelegate { }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> What I don't like with this approach is that inside my delegates, e.g.
>>>>> ColorDelegate.qml, I have to use parent.ListView.view.model to get a
>>>>
>>>> I should clarify: I have to use this notation since it is the parent (the
>>>> Loader) which is the real delegate and has the ListView attached
>>>> properties.
>>>>
>>>> Elvis
>>>>
>>>>> reference to the model (needed for editing operations). The use of
>>>>> "parent" here assumes a certain layout, but I see no other way :(
>>>>>
>>>>> How have others solved the issue of delegates for heterogenous lists?
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Elvis
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Interest mailing list
>>>> Interest@qt-project.org
>>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list
>>> Interest@qt-project.org
>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
