El Wednesday 04 May 2016, Roger Leigh escribió: > I'd basically like to ask if anyone else has encountered issues like > this, and if so: > > - is there any way of avoiding or hiding the includes? > - any other known workarounds or suggestions? > > I'd rather not undef things since my headers might be used by others and > they might need the defines.
I would just #undef the offending and annoying silly definitions. But if you really must, you can give a try to #pragma push_macro and pop_macro. -- Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
