I think, by reading the whole paragraph, that you don't have the right to make for instance a tool that "wraps" moc / uic / rcc and use it under a non-LGPLv3 license.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Jean-Michaël Celerier < jeanmichael.celer...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:41 AM, d3fault <d3faultdot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So since I wrote /path/to/main.cpp in Qt Creator, it’s “output from >> this application”, and since it generates itself, it “generates output >> from this application in it’s original […] form”. >> > > > I don't think that this is relevant to QtCreator because QtCreator has no > "output" per se, > it only calls your compiler (which may be g++, clang, msvc...) behind the > scenes. > And saving a text file can even less be considered an output I think, > imagine if the people making sheets of paper were able to assert their > copyright over > whatever you write on it ? > > But IANAL :) >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
