> On 05 Apr 2016, at 18:29, Reinhardt Behm <rb...@hushmail.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:03:35 NoMercy wrote: >> >> And people keep saying that it is open source, you do it, why don't you do >> it etc. well it maybe open source but I think Qt company is payed well >> considering the license costs, why dont Qt Company do something about it? >> isn't it Qt Company's official product after all? > > First please reply to the list and not to individual users. If I answered to > the list means that I am reading it. No need for direct copies to me. > Second please don't top post even if you find this more "modern”.
I do not always use the same mail client and even though I try to clean up things, as I am a simply human, I may forget to do somethings occasionally. And about the top-posting; thats really an argument belong to entirely different thread on its own. don’t get me started on the anti-topposting obsession/top-post allergy of people here please… And even though its not only me doing these “mistakes” you only seem to attack me over these, I’m wondering why... > > On which real data are just "statistics" based? Seeing many discussions in > this list as well as privately I doubt the validity of your numbers. No real data actually but mere observations, don’t need any real data. its just my personal opinion, I do not claim to now for sure. Regards, Emre Beşirik nome...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
