Hello.
On 22.02.2016 16:43, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote:
Hello,
Following Oliver Goffart's blog bost :
https://woboq.com/blog/moc-myths.html
"For example, I implemented support for templated QObjects in moc
<https://codereview.qt-project.org/49864/>, but this was not merged
because it did not raise enough interest within the Qt project."
I would personnally be quite interested in this feature. Who doesn't
like good generic code ? :) And I am pretty sure that this would
enable wonderful new uses of QObject.
I agree, templated QObject is very nice feature. Few times I used
templates with QObjects, workaround is simple: you declare QObject-based
class, define signals, slots in it... And then declare templated class
derived from that that derived from QObject. But native support of
templated QObject-based classes would be much more better.
Maybe if enough persons manifest themselves on the mailing list ?
I sign you manifest :)
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
