You deserve a hug :) My faith in Qt mobile is restored. Em qui, 16 de jul de 2015 às 19:27, Bob Hood <bho...@comcast.net> escreveu:
> You mean this? > > > http://www.qtworldsummit.com/cpt-sessions/pre-conference-training-qt-for-mobile-platforms-androidios/ > > or this? > > > http://www.qtworldsummit.com/cpt-sessions/getting-started-with-qt-on-android/ > > or this? > > http://www.qtworldsummit.com/cpt-sessions/qt-on-ios-a-to-z/ > > and here: > > > http://www.qtworldsummit.com/cpt-sessions/extending-qt-on-android-apps-using-jni/ > > > What do I win? :) > > > On 7/16/2015 11:16 AM, Daniel França wrote: > > Game: *Find the "Qt in mobile" track of conferences on Qt World Summit > 2015*: > http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/07/16/qt-world-summit-2015-whats-better-than-a-speaker-announcement/ > > I don't know, I'm afraid that Qt is not caring much about mobile anymore. > > Em qui, 16 de jul de 2015 às 11:29, Gian Maxera <gmax...@gmail.com> > escreveu: > >> Let’s focus on the website and Qt … because even If I want to convince >> a big company to move and using Qt … how can I do that if the Qt website is >> so messy and so a disaster ? >> I don’t think a company that can afford 350 $/month will be convinced by >> the Qt website that their product is reliable and trustable … because >> (maybe it’s my bias) but everything some commercial doesn’t give me a clear >> view of their product and a clear view of pricing … I always think that his >> going to cheat me in someways. Maybe it’s me … who knows :-) >> We don’t know how many commercial licenses Qt sell and how much is the Qt >> profit. >> Why don’t share also this information on the website ? >> I think is can be very useful for catching new customer to clear state on >> the website something like that: “We have 14500 companies that rely on Qt >> Commercial license” >> >> Ciao, >> Gianluca. >> >> >> On 16 Jul 2015, at 10:23, Daniel França <daniel.fra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ohh, forgot about the extended availability of indie licenses. >> >> Anyway, I do agree 100% with Nuno, most of people I talk don't even know >> about Qt. >> Qt is an amazing framework, QML is fantastic to build UI, but it's >> missing the point to let more people know about it and I don't think that >> removing indie license is a good move in that direction. >> >> >> Em qui, 16 de jul de 2015 às 10:42, Nuno Santos < >> nunosan...@imaginando.pt> escreveu: >> >>> To all Qt company workers out there: >>> >>> Please pass this feedback to the right persons in sales and >>> management. This last month has clearly shown that there is a lot on >>> unexploited sales potential out there. >>> >>> Having a good product is not enough. You need to know how to sell it! >>> >>> Xamarin has a clear pricing table, does Adwords, Facebook Ads, etc. >>> This is something every company does nowadays to sell their products. >>> >>> Most of the developers I know and talk to *don’t even know* Qt. >>> >>> Qt has an AWESOME product but most of the developers don’t know about >>> it. That will not happen by miracle! >>> >>> You should definitely start organising local events with Qt >>> evangelisers in key cities, to spread the technology and show it’s >>> potential. >>> >>> And YES, the new website is a complete disaster. >>> >>> Please exchange the *Download* top bar navigation by *Pricing* and be >>> explicit. You have a good example here: >>> >>> https://store.xamarin.com/ >>> >>> With the indie licenses you don’t earn money in short term, but you >>> are preparing the new wave of developers to evangelise your technology and >>> use it in the future in their successful companies or jobs. >>> >>> >>> Or maybe we are all wrong and Qt Company is already having a huge >>> profit and an exponential growth in users, if that is the case, sorry, we >>> don’t have the data to see the whole picture. >>> >>> Once again, Qt Rocks! >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Nuno >>> >>> On 16 Jul 2015, at 09:28, Gian Maxera <gmax...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> I don’t know if in this mailing list there is someone in charge of >>> developing the Qt.io new website … so, sorry If I’m complaining on the >>> wrong list, but the new Qt.io website is a nightmare maze ! :-( >>> There is no way to understand what Qt does on different platform and >>> license. >>> Where is a simple pricing table with what’s included or not ? Where is a >>> list and a comparison of what it’s included for each commercial license ? >>> What are the purpose of the wizard-questions that get you to one of the >>> Qt products ? The questions are very strange and weird ! >>> Why I cannot just select the type of the license I want without >>> answering to all these questions ? >>> How can I get the indie license ? I tried to answer in different ways >>> trying a lot of combination … but I always end on two possible outcomes: >>> LGPL free and 350$/month commercial one ! >>> So, are there only two type of licensing ? So, why just do not clear say >>> that on the website ? >>> >>> Sorry about this complain … but I’m complaining because I love Qt … and >>> the old website was so good, so clear, so simple … that this new confusion, >>> obscure website does not help me to spread the voice about the powerful of >>> Qt. >>> >>> Ciao, >>> Gianluca. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Interest mailing list >>> Interest@qt-project.org >>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Interest mailing list >>> Interest@qt-project.org >>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Interest mailing list >> Interest@qt-project.org >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing > listInterest@qt-project.orghttp://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > >
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
