On Thursday 11 June 2015 17:49:22 Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On 11/06/15 17:06, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Thursday 11 June 2015 16:20:03 Hamish Moffatt wrote: > >> On 11/06/15 00:20, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 10 June 2015 06:22:03 Adam Light wrote: > >>>> In my experience, bugs that start out unassigned never end up getting > >>>> triaged, and thus fixed (granted, a small sample size). > >>>> > >>>> I realize that someone *could* work on a bug that's unassigned. > >>> > >>> In my experience, bugs are triaged even if they are assigned to someone > >>> else. And I have a large sample size. > >> > >> Is it normal for all bugs to be triaged and then assigned a priority? > > > > Yes. > > > >> This seems to usually happen soon after reporting a bug, but I have some > >> exceptions and I would like to know if those bugs will ever be looked at. > > > > That usually means there was no one capable of analysing the issue and > > deciding the priority. That doesn't bode well for the bug report. > > As it's 8 months old already it would seem so. Ironically it's assigned > to you. :-)
That means I will get to it eventually. I don't need the priority setting to tell me what I need to work on :-) -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
