On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 4:46 PM, René J.V. <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday May 23 2015 16:37:23 Mark Gaiser wrote: > > > So mozjpeg is out for the general jpeg purpose. > > Some MacPorts people seem to think it can be used as such, but it'd be the > end-user's choice, so I have no issue with that. > > > That leaves jpeg-turbo which is basically jpeg only with much improved > > encode/decode performance. In general, jpeg-turbo should suffice wherever > > you want to use jpeg images. One thing to note with jpeg-turbo is > anything > > that is using SmartScale (from jpeg 8+) won't work with it. > > Are you sure that's already in jpeg v8? I got the impression it was > introduced with v9, and that libjpeg-turbo's v8 emulation is complete. > > I'm as sure as the wiki page that states it [1] :) Quote: "... the libjpeg-turbo Project has chosen to forgo emulating libjpeg v9.[11] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libjpeg#cite_note-v9turbo-11> Therefore, SmartScale files created by libjpeg v8 and later will not be decompressed correctly by libjpeg-turbo." [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libjpeg#libjpeg-turbo
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
