On Saturday 23 May 2015, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hi, > > Since Qt depends on libjpeg I thought I'd ask what experience members on > here have in using one of the (supposedly?) ABI compatible alternatives, > libjpeg-turbo or mozjpeg. There is discussion within MacPorts to replace > libjpeg with one of those alternatives, and force all ports to comply > (which would affect Qt if MacPorts is still used "stock" in preparing the > binary installation packages for OS X). This venture is complicated by the > fact that libjpeg has been at version 9 for a while now, which is *not* > ABI compatible with the alternatives. > On some Linux distros libjpeg-turbo is installed as the default libjpeg, and Qt automatically links to that. I have not heard of any issues with that.
Regards `Allan _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
