> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 at 7:24 PM > From: "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > To: interest@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Interest] sqlite > > On Friday 17 April 2015 21:57:44 Jason H wrote: > > I've used SQLite as a table store pretty extensively and I can say: > > > > 1. It works as advertised. It allows multiple processes to access the same > > database safely. Threads no. Processes yes. > > 2. Multiple process performance > > is low. It may me adequate if there is not a lot of concurrency, just a lot > > of different processes that occasionally write. > > 3. Multiple process > > performance is not just low, it is terrible. As far as I can tell there is > > no elegant concurrency, just locking. > > 4. The OP could use a table as a > > notification queue. > > IIRC, Chrome/Chromium/Blink uses a shared SQLite as the backend for > transmitting certain information between the multi-process architecture it > has.
It wouldn't surprise me at all. Maybe they use the special :memory: database? I'm not sure if that uses mmaped files, but if so, it could be a very cool IPC. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
