My real problem is with the slot parameter type that will not exist in Android.
> On 04 Feb 2015, at 10:37, Reinhardt Behm <rb...@hushmail.com> wrote: > > -- > Best Regards > > Reinhardt Behm > > mailto: rb...@hushmail.com > Skype: reinhardt.behm > > A different header file is possible but a bit messy solution. > You can use the macro in the .cpp to create one real slot function and one > for > android which is just an empty dummy. > > Moc does not care what you do in your .cpp file. > > -- > Reinhardt > > On Wednesday 04 February 2015 10:21:02 Nuno Santos wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for your reply. >> >> How can I workaround this situation? Create a specific source file for >> Android? >> >> Any other ideas? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Nuno >> >>> On 04 Feb 2015, at 10:18, Reinhardt Behm <rb...@hushmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Wednesday 04 February 2015 10:05:12 Nuno Santos wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have been faced with an awkward situation when building an app for >>>> android: >>>> >>>> My app uses Bonjour but that is not available on Android, so basically >>>> for >>>> android I don’t want to include some slots in a particular class: >>>> >>>> #ifndef Q_OS_ANDROID >>>> void recordAdded(const BonjourRecord &record); >>>> void recordRemoved(const BonjourRecord &record); >>>> void bonjourRecordResolved(const QHostInfo &hostInfo, int port); >>>> #endif >>>> >>>> When compiling for Android, moc file as complaining about not having the >>>> implementation of the methods above which means that the preprocessor has >>>> passed over Q_OS_ANDROID, however, QtCreator had that area greyed out. >>>> >>>> Is Q_OS_ANDROID available at the time the header file is processed for >>>> moc >>>> generation? to avoid this situation? >>> >>> MOC does not understand and therefor does not respect macros and #ifdef. > _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
