On Tuesday January 06 2015 11:36:18 René J.V. Bertin wrote: > And then the hackers' delight question: > Staring at the code at almost 3am this morning it occurred to me that there > is nothing wrong per se if QAction::isEnabled() returns false if the d > pointer is NULL (an invalid QAction cannot/shouldn't be enabled), so I > changed `return d->enabled` to `return d? d->enabled : false;` . Haven't seen > the crash occur since ...
The question here is of course: how wrong is that approach? R. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
