On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:21:19 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how did you try to build this? Did you use qmake, plain make, cmake, ...?
>
> However, I think you do need a constructor for classes that are processed
> by moc - at least it is good style to provide one. One like this would be
> sufficient:
>
> C++-98: NewTest(){}
> C++-11: NewTest()=default;
http://marcmutz.wordpress.com/effective-qt/subclassing/
>
> Also, it is bad style to declare moc'ed classes in the CPP file. Please
> use headers for this.
It's common and fine to do this for tests.
Thanks,
--
Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com
Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
