Hi Sarah,
If I understand it correctly regarding the licensing issue, you may want to use
LGPL(as opposed to GPL), that does not require you to release the source code,
however, perhaps somebody who are more experienced than me can explain on this,
because I'm also interested in knowing this issue and any possible solutions.
-alfa-
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 12:47 PM, sarah jones <qtsa...@outlook.com> wrote:
Hi
I team and I are planning to release our desktop application that is
dynamically linked to the Qt library.
As I understand it this means that, if requested by a customer, I must make the
source code for Qt available.
In addition I must make the object code or source code for the application
available to a customer on request.
Has anyone any experience in this area ?
Are my understandings correct?
Are there any obligations on us if using the LPGL?
Thanks
Sarah
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
