Em sex 28 mar 2014, às 13:41:48, Rutledge Shawn escreveu: > Aside: I wonder why cmst doesn't use Qt bearer management. It's too > incomplete, something wrong with it, or the author didn't know about it? I > haven't gotten around to trying it myself. When I switched from wicd to > connman a couple of months ago on my laptop, I didn't find a Qt client, so > have still been using the gtk one for now. But IMO it would be even better > to make a nice QML interface to connman (via bearer management to the > extent possible?) so that the whole UI can be built in Qt Quick. But that > sounds like the kind of project that KDE will need to do at some point… so > maybe somebody already started.
Qt API has never been meant as a system administration tool. I understood from the OP that the application in question was a management tool, allowing one to configure which connections exist, their settings, turn them on and off, etc. That's beyond the scope of Qt's bearer API. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
