Em dom 23 mar 2014, às 02:26:41, Guido Seifert escreveu: > > Em dom 23 mar 2014, às 01:42:11, Guido Seifert escreveu: > > > Is there a correct way for me to get it installed in C:\Qt521 after > > > build? > > > > -prefix and make install are not tested on Windows. > > Not nice. What worth is a Qt built into %CD%\qtbase?
It's how it's been done for 15 years. The only difference in Qt 5 is the "qtbase" part, because now you're running a different script. The main configure remains in qtbase and you should pass -prefix %CD% or not pass anything. Passing something different should work (and does work on Unix), but as you've found out, it's broken on Windows since no one tests that. > If there isn't > something I miss, it cannot be properly out of source build. Yes, it can. You can do out-of-source builds and those work just fine. That has nothing to do with make install. You're not asking for out-of-source, you're asking for install-out-of-build. > Due to > absolute paths it cannot be easily moved. How do I get it into C:\Qt521? It cannot be easily moved and we know that. It's been like that for 15 years. The installers have always hacked around the problem: they do a binary edit of the DLLs and of qmake to replace the build paths with the install path. > The only way I currently see is to move it manually and then see, if one of > the unofficial ways to patch the absolute paths in Qt works. For me this > looks definitely broken. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
