On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Saether Jan-Arve <jan-arve.saet...@digia.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mark Gaiser [mailto:mark...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 3. mars 2014 13:10 >> To: Saether Jan-Arve >> Cc: Qt Interest >> Subject: Re: [Interest] Row(Layout), use spacing as resize handle. How >> to do that? >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Saether Jan-Arve <Jan- >> arve.saet...@digia.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Mark Gaiser [mailto:mark...@gmail.com] >>>> >>>> Now i've actually tested the SplitView :) And it behaves >>>> differently compared to RowLayout. In a bad way. >>>> In a row layout something like: >>>> >>>> RowLayout { >>>> anchord.fill: parent >>>> >>>> Rectangle { >>>> Layout.fillWidth: true >>>> Layout.fillHeight: true >>>> color: "red" >>>> } >>>> >>>> Rectangle { >>>> Layout.fillWidth: true >>>> Layout.fillHeight: true >>>> color: "green" >>>> } >>>> } >>>> results in red and green being evenly distributed. In a SplitView >>>> that is not the case. There the first rectangle (the red one) is >>>> getting all the space. Green is on the right and all you see is the >>>> splitter to "drag it in". Just change "RowLayout" to "SplitView" >>>> and you will see what i mean. >>>> >>>> Bug report time? >>>> >>> No, this is not a bug. This was a design decision for SplitView. >>> Note that, the only thing that is shared between SplitView and >> RowLayout is the "Layout" attached property. Its distribution policy >> is completely different. >> >> I was afraid you would say that. >> Is there a reason for it? Since it "feels" inconsistent when comparing >> to RowLayout. > Yes, it's inconsistent with RowLayout, but SplitView is not a layout. > Therefore, it is consistent ;) > > SplitView is more like the Row positioner where one item can be interactively > resized. And the minimum and maximum sizes are only enforced during the > interactive resize. The reason why it uses the "Layout" attached property was > discussed during our design phase, and the main argument for using it was a > smaller API (we didn't have to duplicate similar concepts). > > Jan Arve > >
Yeah, i understand. It will do just fine once i get used to it :) _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
