Ola Røer Thorsen schreef op 25-11-2013 9:58: > Got it, thanks. > > It's unfortunate that there is a method and a signal in > QAbstractSocket witht the same name, but I guess we're stuck with that > now. > Please note that this goes for *any* method that has an overload. And that any method that currently does not have an overload, may still get one in the future. If you don't want to run the risk of source incompatabilities in the future, I'd always use the explicit signature.
André _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
