2013/9/19 Andrea Franceschini <therealmorph...@gmail.com>: > 2013/9/19 Andrea Franceschini <therealmorph...@gmail.com>: >> 2013/9/19 Casimiro, Daniel C CIV NUWC NWPT <daniel.casim...@navy.mil>: >> >>> I just reread the specification and it looks like duplicate session IDs are >>> allowed: >> >> I'll run some tests and will let you know. > > Hi Dan, just ran a quick test and I can confirm I don't get the failed > assert on the add_touch_point method anymore, now I get it on the > update_touch_point method.
Just ran a few more tests, which confused me quite a lot. It would seem that the session id doesn't change, but at some point during an update sequence I get an add event immediately followed by a remove event, and then more updates, like so Add: 368 Upd: 368 ... Upd: 368 Add: 368 Rem: 368 Upd: 368 ... Rem: 368 Which is rather odd since I've had no such thing happening in all my other applications built with other toolkits. Could this have something to do with Qt's internals? -- Andrea Franceschini _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
