Agreed, but I also wrote my own if you want a no-frills direct-to-sqlite-table
one.
Oh, I take that back, I do have one frill, which is transaction support.
________________________________
From: Bo Thorsen <bthor...@ics.com>
To: interest@qt-project.org
Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Interest] Making an ORM Library
Den 06-09-2013 15:57, Konstantin Tokarev skrev:
>
> 06.09.2013, 17:32, "Michael Dougras Silva" <micdoug.si...@gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am making an ORM library for Qt using the meta-object system to store
>> informations about the classes to be mapped. I am using defines like
>> Q_PROPERTY() with parameters that generates inline functions returning the
>> meta information, helping me to register this informations on meta-object
>> system.
>>
>> This works for now, but I thinking that all classes to be mapped have to be
>> QObject derivated, thus store this classes in Qt containers isn't possible.
>>
>> There are a way to use the meta-object system without derivating from
>> QObject? If not, I thinking to make an application like moc that generates
>> code for storing the meta information, thus making possible to use the
>> classes mapped without deriving from QObject. What do you thinking about
>> this?
>
> Have you looked at QxOrm or ODB? Both of them do not require derivation from
> QObject.
Konstantins answer also suggests that the time might be better spent
helping out one of the two existing projects instead of starting a new one.
Bo.
--
Bo Thorsen, European Qt Manager, Integrated Computer Solutions
ICS - Delivering World-Class Applications for Embedded & Mobile Devices
http://ics.com/services
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
