Thanks for the 5.2 update. Currently I keep the result from connect as you say.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > On domingo, 8 de setembro de 2013 23:55:15, Philipp Kursawe wrote: >> Well, my example was not complete.Of course the lambda code does >> something in real. The problem seems to be, that Qt by itself does not >> delete lambda based connections properly. > > it deletes them when the *sender* is deleted. It doesn't know what the lambda > does, so there's no way to tell to delete when one of the variables inside the > lambda becomes invalid. > > In Qt 5.2, you will be able to associate them also with a receiver, in which > case the connection will be deleted when either sender or receiver is deleted. > > To do more complex things, keep the return result from connect() and use it to > disconnect. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
