El Jueves, 5 de septiembre de 2013, Rutledge Shawn escribió: > But we should be trying to get there, IMO. The new qml tool (just qml, as > opposed to qmlscene/qmlviewer) is intended for > that. https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,43540 It can be used as > a shebang handler on Linux/Unix platforms, and as the default application > to handle the .qml file type when you double-click a qml file in the file > manager on all 3 desktop platforms.
+1 I've always though that it would be awesome a qml executable that could run simple programs. For instance, I've found the kdialog program a quite handy tool in several situations, but is limited to small dialogs in a sequence, and shell script. The qml program would be much more powerful in UI capabilities, language in which to program on, and of course, cross platform. However... I'm partially in the side of those that dislike scripting languages for something not trivial. I remember back in the KDE3 days when a nice set of administration tools written in Python-Qt3 (guidedog, guarddog, watchdog or something like that) was popular as GUI tools for important tasks that usually only do in the console. When you loaded then in the Control Center, they were clearly much slower to load and less responsive. Now, in the Nokia N9, I mostly use two python applications (gpodder and wazzap), and they are also slow (specially wazzap, which is _really_ slow to load and terribly unresponsive; is not that bad with gpodder). One interesting post by the gpodder author: http://thpmaemo.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-way-forward-with-python-on-qt-5.html -- Alex (a.k.a. suy) | GPG ID 0x0B8B0BC2 http://barnacity.net/ | http://disperso.net _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
