And I was taught... int ii in for loops :) -----Original Message----- From: interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs....@qt-project.org [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs....@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Crowell Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 4:40 AM To: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] [SOLVED] Re: Compiling Programs with C++11 with Qt5, which was compiled without C++11 flag. Possible?
One of the reasons that I avoid single letter variable names like the plague. (except int i; in for loops) :D On 8/15/2013 6:15 PM, Guido Seifert wrote: > You are great. On the spot with your error analysis. (This is a > general response to all, who helped brainstorming) :-) I just found this on > SO: > >> Yay, someone (JKSH) found what the problem was on Qt Project forums (here). >> In short: The problem was that I had written somewhere #define I >> complex(0.0, 1.0), which created a name clash in qobjectdefs_impl.h >> (where complex was a typedef for std::complex<double>). For some >> (weird) reason that didn’t cause any problems as long as I didn’t write >> CONFIG = c+11 in the pro file, but not it did after writing it. > Guido > > > _______________________________________________ > Interest mailing list > Interest@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
