On quarta-feira, 31 de julho de 2013 16:53:46, Niels Dekker wrote:
> On 2013-07-31 16:24, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> > I think those headers were made private in Qt 5.1 (they were
> > public by mistake).
> > Anyways, what if you do something like:
> > QSqlDatabase db = QSqlDatabase::addDatabase("QODBC");
> 
> Thank you, Sergio. So even Qt 4 users should not #include
> <QtSql/QODBCDriver> or do 'new QODBCDriver', right?

Right.

> FWIW, I do think calling QSqlDatabase::addDatabase(new QODBCDriver) is
> more type safe than calling QSqlDatabase::addDatabase("QODBC"): Typo's
> in the class name 'QODBCDriver' are likely to be detected earlier than
> typo's in the string "QODBC".

Correct, but that implies making the class public. It can't be, because it 
includes private API (other _p.h headers).

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

Reply via email to