On quinta-feira, 4 de julho de 2013 22.11.40, Mark wrote: > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo <dange...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 4 July 2013 21:50, Mark <mark...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Defining a QVector with an std::unique_ptr seems to work just fine. No > >> error, compile wise. > >> QVector<std::unique_ptr<QUrl>> test; > > > > You can't use std::unique_ptr in Qt containers. Qt containers require > > the type to have a default constructor, a copy constructor, and an > > assignment operator [1], and you can't copy a std::unique_ptr. > > > > [1] > > http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtcore/containers.html#assignable-data-t > > ype -- > > Giuseppe D'Angelo > > Ahh, oke. That makes it obvious. > > But is this something that is planned to be allowed for a future Qt > version? Please don't say "Qt 6" :p
It's not planned, period. The Qt containers will forever require the ability to copy. It doesn't make sense to introduce containers that don't. Those are called "Standard Library". -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
