On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> wrote: > On Friday, June 14, 2013 16:43:12 Sandro Andrade wrote: >> Am I missing something ? > > The QML engine doesn't use the QVariant API for accessing things in a > QVariant. So capabilities you have when using QVariant/Q_PROPERTY are not > available in QML. This is probably fixable, but I'm not sure it's understood > by the people who know QML well enough to fix it.
I can't find the task for it, which might be needed in order to fix it ;). When the engine internals finish being re-written again we'll have a chance to fix it, so raise a task if it's not there. I don't think the problem though would be that we're not using the QVariant API (I think it's correct to leave it as a variant), it's that QList<QObject*> is mapping to QVariant(QObjectList) in script instead of array<Object>. QObjectList would be reasonable to deal with specially for the read-only case, we just need to be able to block writing to it (because for a writable list you should be using QQmlListProperty). It could be that last caveat which has been blocking implementation for so long. Maybe even with V4 the change will be impractical to implement, but it's worth checking out. -- Alan Alpert _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
