On 4/8/2013 11:31 AM, Christian Dähn wrote: > Hi Nils, > I reviewed it and am currently running tests under Win XP + 7 and > different Linux versions. > > All tests should be finished till tomorrow - then the behaviour is > checked for up to date > Windows ans Linux versions (fresh installs with industrial apps for > banking/insurance > and sortation systems). > I'll post my test results and comment in the codereview system. > So hopefully a Troll will accept your commit after multiple devs checked > and marked this > minor change as proven.
So can I assume that you've been able to repro this behavior? > ciao, > Chris > > > On 8. April 2013 at 10:49 Nils Jeisecke <njeise...@saltation.de> wrote: > > > > > > Hi List, > > > > some time ago I've submitted a fix for a QtSingleApplication problem. > > The current implementation does not reliably prevent starting multiple > > instances on Windows . > > > > There does not seem to be a maintainer for Qt Solutions. So I'd > > welcome anyone interested in reviewing this one line change: > > > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44118 > > > > I've checked this on Mac OS X and Linux and it doesn't show any > > negative impact there. > > > > Best regards > > > > Nils > > _______________________________________________ > > Interest mailing list > > Interest@qt-project.org > > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest > > _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
