Hello Tony!
I have something of a side question, below.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Tony Rietwyk <t...@rightsoft.com.au> wrote:
> Hi Ken,
> ...
> // Hack to get around Qt strictness...
>
> class TSleepThread: public QThread
> {
> public:
> static void sleep(unsigned long secs) { QThread::sleep(secs); };
> static void msleep(unsigned long msecs) { QThread::msleep(msecs); };
> static void usleep(unsigned long usecs) { QThread::usleep(usecs); };
> };
> ...
I've done this "hack" before to unprotect QThread::sleep. But for the
life of me I cannot figure out why QThread:: sleep is protected (or, at
least, why there isn't some other unprotected static sleep somewhere).
A cross-platform sleep (in a cross-platform framework, at that). What's
not to like?
But seriously, does anyone know what the motivation for making sleep
protected might have been?
> ...
> Regards,
> Tony
Thanks.
K. Frank
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
