On 2/1/2013 5:40 PM, Alan Alpert wrote: > There is no "dominant side". C++ and QML are both viable options for > writing your UI with Qt (actually, right now QML is not a viable > option for the average desktop UI but it's getting close). It's not > even two entirely separate worlds, QML depends on C++ development and > is primarily focused on the case where they work together. > > [...] > > Maybe there's some confusion about the separate worlds of Widgets > (with its C++ only API) and QtQuick (with its QML only API). In that > case, they're also targeting separate use-cases so there's little need > for convergence. Widgets will continue to work for the classic > desktop-based applications, and QtQuick still has a lot of work to be > just as good for mobile as widgets already are for desktop.
Thanks, Alan. Those are bullet points I can probably leverage. :) _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
