On 17/01/13 17:31, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <rea...@gmail.com > <mailto:rea...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > I'm thinking more of ScummVM, DOSBox, Snes9x, etc. Would you run those > on the server? Sure you can do it. But running on the client instead > has enormous benefits. Having to download 10MB of JS is a small price > to pay. If that really was such a concern, YouTube wouldn't bee that > popular. > > > And here we are finally, back to the thin client vs fat client debate > :-) It always happens when webapps are involved.
Not when you don't have a server, just dump web-space ;-) Google had the right idea with NaCL, but since other browsers don't plan to support it, we're stuck with JS. Emscripten can have enormous value for this kind of thing. _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
