On sexta-feira, 28 de dezembro de 2012 15.16.41, André Somers wrote: > Op 28-12-2012 14:23, Scott Aron Bloom schreef: > > Has anyone brought up the property system that MOC provides as well? > > Maybe I missed it... > Well, yeah. In my first reply, I said (in general): > > Second, moc and Q_OBJECT does a > > good deal more than just dealing with signals and slots. > > That includes properties, introspection needed for scripts and whatnot > > :-) But as the original focussed on signals and slots, I focussed on > > that aspect as well.
See also: http://www.macieira.org/blog/2011/09/the-future-of-moc/. Especially the part "But we still need moc", where it reads: "What’s more, the most important reason why we need moc is not related to the signals and slots." If you want more info on why we can't use PMFs, see my comment: http://www.macieira.org/blog/2011/09/the-future-of-moc/#comment-120 -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
