Am Freitag, 5. Oktober 2012, 20:20:40 schrieb Sujan Dasmahapatra:
> This code snippet is nomore hanging. i did some mistake. but it's still the
> same. not writing some data to the file. problem persists. whats still
> going wrong please help.
>
> [code]
>
>
> QSemaphore mSemaphore1;
>
> int nZ=1;
>
> for (int z=0;z<nZ;z++)
>
> {
>
> Q_ASSERT( &mSemaphore1 );
>
> Th = QtConcurrent::run(
>
> this,&UNRSTParser::ProcessZLayer,z);
>
> mSemaphore1.release(1);
This release is at the wrong place. It belong to the _end_ of
UNRSTParser::ProcessZLayer. That's why I put a helper-class into my example.
Doing it here renders the Semaphore useless - Because you want the below
acquire() to _block until all QFutures are finished_.
> values += (nX*nY);
>
> }
>
> mSemaphore1.acquire(nZ);
>
>
> [/code]
>
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Jan Kundrát <j...@flaska.net> wrote:
> > On 10/05/12 00:27, Sascha Cunz wrote:
> > > But, after all, the above code is a so called busy-loop. It will eat up
> >
> > 1 core
> >
> > > almost completely (At least on most OS-configurations).
> >
> > Are you sure that a call to QFuture::waitForFinished() consumes CPU?
> > That would be highly suspicious. Yes, the call will block and wait until
> > the QFuture succeeds, but that's different from what a busy loop is.
> >
> > Using waitForFinished() on each future is easier and more
> > straightforward than adding semaphores.
> >
> > With kind regards,
> > Jan
> >
> > --
> > Trojita, a fast e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Interest mailing list
> > Interest@qt-project.org
> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
