On quinta-feira, 4 de outubro de 2012 12.44.21, Jan Kundrát wrote: > That's the reason. I expect Q_CHECK_PTR's error message is not going to > change, so in my opinion it's better to get 'ASSERT: "foo"' than "out of > memory".
In Qt 5, Q_CHECK_PTR will throw std::bad_alloc in case it runs into a null pointer. The end result is usually the same: the application aborts. Usually. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
