On quinta-feira, 30 de agosto de 2012 16.34.22, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > I guess that all of these facts apply to building on Linux. As for Mac, I > have a feeling that OS scheduler is somewhat more fair there, and complete > CPU utilization is achieved with lesser threads.
My impression is that the scheduler in Linux is the best of all.
In any case, no scheduler can make I/O go faster. If you have 4 cores and one
thread is waiting for I/O, you're squandering resources.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
