Op 16-8-2012 15:02, Mark Summerfield schreef: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 05:24:21 -0700 (PDT) > Jason H <scorp...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>> - A new model/view architecture that is a lot easier to use and which >>> is >> designed from the ground up to work well with databases. >> I complain about it too, but I cannot suggest a better one than what >> exists. For all its complexity it works well. > There was a Model/View NG project... Which basically became what we have now in QML, if I am correct. > >>> - High-level support for client/server programming with the middleware >> able to be straight TCP/IP (e.g., for LANs), OpenVPN, etc. >> QtSOAP is not good enough, however, I think a Q-Object based SOAP proxy >> should not be that hard. This fall I worked on stuff that uses a lot of >> QMeta. I can think it can be done, if only Qt XML support did not suck. > Sending XML isn't the issue (and is wasteful of bandwidth anyway). I was > thinking of signals/slots that used RPC so that a client can emit a > signal thats recevied in a slot on a server and vice versa. libqxt already provides that.
André _______________________________________________ Interest mailing list Interest@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
